“A Case for Torture” by Michael Levin Essay

The Case for Torture by Michael Levin, presents excellent justification for the use of torture in situations of extreme desperation. Levin gives huge parametric quantitys for the use of torture through clever wording and heavy(p) exemplification. In supplement to the already grand argument, he provides potential counter-arguments and proves why they argon in logical. It is made very release that he believes that torture is morally authorisation and assumes great effort to s government agency the opinion of readers, provided they keep an open mind. Levin presents a great argument and presents the ideas in an make fashion, scarce as with some testifys, it is not without flaw and could use some minor changes to forge this great act into a incredible essay.The format of the inlet of Levins essay is somewhat unusual. It begins with a few powerful statements, but the very first of all statement violates a rule of literature, inclusion of an unsupported fact. Levin says, It i s largely untrue that torture is impermissible, a throwback to a more brutal age. not only is the statement a generalization, he is saying that something is generally assumed, but he does not say whom it is assumed by. So who generally assumes it? It seems it is more of a mistake of wording because he is the one who is assuming that generally people think torture is wrong, therefore the essay should read that way because the last thing one should do is start off on the wrong foot.The essay truly lacks any trus cardinalrthy lead-in or background. The essay just jumps right into the real issues without introducing them or explaining why it was until now written in the first place. The reason for the essay is not the real issue though. The issue is that it lacks background because it doesnt appear that Levin is actually reason against another signalise of view. Last I knew, an argument required two points of view to start with, but as I read the introduction it doesnt seem he ha s an opponent to win favor over. Without misgiving it is obvious that the paper is about torture, but the introduction does not lay out the main ideas as clearly as it should introduce them.Upon reading the carcass of the essay, it also comes off as plain. The split ups in the essay do not seem to flow together, but rather jump fromone point to the next. While the carve ups may be about the same topic overall, the revolution between minor points is somewhat abrupt and adds to the essays unfinished feel. Another point of interest is Levins inclusion of two subtitles however, the subtitles argon not complete. The first subtitle reads, Death, but the following paragraph does not discuss death.With Death being the subtitle, it seems thats what the paragraph would be about. The next and last subtitle reads, Idealism, and accordingly that is what the following paragraph is about, but why does that paragraph gets a subtitle and the previous do not is a mystery because they are all ab out something various as they should be. It seems to be another oversight that also adds to the essays unfinished quality.Though the essay has its flaws, it is not without strong points. Levins great use of examples through hypothetical situations really brings the reader in and assist in his quest to change their point of view. The examples themselves do not make the essay however, its clear they are greatly assisted by the excellent use of vocabulary and clever wording. Levin does a great profession of using powerful words, it makes the essay seem more credible and creates a feeling that the writer really knows what hes talking about. why that may or may not be the case, it can be said that Levin really knows how to write a good persuasive argument however, his oversights work out from what could be an incredible persuasive essay.The overall impression of the essay was good. It seemed the argument itself was well though out, but the actual writing itself was what some needed work. Without a doubt, Levins essay presents some very valid facts and they are rather well supported in most cases however, to make a strong argument you need support on both level. Not only do all the facts need to be organized and well developed, but the writing does as well. As previously stated, it is clear that Levin really knows how to write a good persuasive argument however, his oversights deduct from what could be an incredible persuasive essay.